IN THE NAME OF ALLAH,
THE BENEFICENT, THE MERCIFUL
THE “ROAD MAP” FOR IRAQ
[Shamim A Siddiqi, NY]
President Bush has developed some
“expertise” in developing roadmap for Palestine
towards resolving the dispute between Israel and Palestinians. However, it
is a different dory that it stands hijacked by Sharon and his hard-line
supporters. It is unlikely to be effective due to adamancy of Zionist’s dream
to dominate the world and hence it does not accept any “stumbling block” in its
way to world “supremacy”. If President Bush cannot smash this “dragon” head,
his roadmap for Palestine
is doomed for good.
Similarly, in collaboration with
Paul Bremer, the head of Iraq’s
Interim Administrative Council and under the pressure of strong demand
solicited by the “hand-picked” provisional government of Iraq, President
Bush has made important strategic changes in his roadmap of Iraq to
“restore” democracy and soon get rid of the “allegation” of “the occupied”
forces. Originally the game plan was to draft the constitution, hold the
elections, transfer the power to the elected people of the land and withdraw
American forces in the “background.”
But the “Iraqis” are eager to get
the power “now” or never. The Iraqi Governing Council announced yesterday [November 15, 2003] that it
would create a provisional government by June and full power will be
transferred to this body, providing an “exit strategy” for the USA. The Bush
administration has dropped its insistence to draft the constitution first, hold
the elections and frame the constitution. With the return of sovereign power in
June 04, military “occupancy” of Iraq will come to an end but the
American forces will remain in Iraq
under some “negotiated” terms and condition with the would-be Iraqi
administration in power. Until the requisite constitution is adopted, some
basic laws will be promulgated in February 2004, establishing a democratic and
federal state that “respects” the “Islamic identity” of Iraq, guarantees the
human rights and ensures the equality in diversity of different religious sects
and ethnic groups, a job that is hard to attain in the midst of so much
distrust and misgivings against each other.
This “roadmap” is unlikely to
work for Iraq
as the Bush administration is not acknowledging the realities on the ground. A
“selected” democratic government dominated by the Shiite Muslims of the south
will not be acceptable to Kurdish and the Sunni minorities. The would-be
democratically elected government will be predominantly controlled by the
Shiite Muslims, rendering the Kurdish and Sunni Muslims as permanent minorities,
a condition that would never be acceptable to these minorities. So will be the
case with the constitution that would be framed by the Shiite dominated
majority. If the Shiite community of Iraq does insist to hold its
majority, it would result in the partition of the country into three
independent states, a process of Balkanization of Iraq. It would be a
disservice to Iraq
and the USA
would deliver to the country only chaos and disestablishment in the region.
History provides a glaring
example in this respect. The Muslims of India were always conscious of the fact
that if British transfer the right of paramountacy to India where the
Hindus were in permanent majority, Muslims will be turn into a permanent
minority. Hence Muslims demanded a separate homeland and after a prolong fight
and enormous sacrifices of life and resources they got it in the shape of Pakistan. Both
British and the USA should learn a lesson from their own past and dare not repeat
the mistake of transferring power to an “elected” or an “unelected” Shiite
dominated regime and entrust it the task of framing the future constitution of
the country by the few handpicked “stooges” of their liking without introducing definite guarantees for
the minorities. It is incumbent upon the USA to work as “honest” brokers
where the future of Iraq
is at stake and their own “prestige” and words of honor to deliver peace,
freedom, liberty and justice to all appears to be in jeopardy.
The honest course for President
Bush is to declare his roadmap for the restoration of democracy in Iraq through
adopting the following confirmed commitment:
1. Holding general
elections in the country by June 2004, even on restricted franchise;
2. Transfer the supreme power to this elected
body that would have two functions at a time to perform: 1. Working as the Legislative Assembly with a
Prime Minister and a cabinet for running day to day administrative affairs of
the country; 2. also working as the Constituent Assembly of the country to
frame the future constitution by December 2004 with two houses: Lower
house on the basis of universal franchise [one vote one person] and a Senate that represents equal
representatives form Shiites, Sunnis and Kurdish communities with veto power to
reject any measure that is prejudicial to any of the three sectors of the
society, a guarantee that the rights of each will be protected by constitution
and no law will be frame by anyone against anyone.
3. Under the constitution with aforesaid
guarantees, elections could be held within 2005 at a suitable time that suits
the people of the land and all the necessary formalities are completed for
free, fair and transparent elections in independent Iraq.
This three steps declaration by
President Bush would have stabilized the situation in Iraq. It would
have categorically give a roadmap to the people of Iraq to work for it genuinely
expecting that sovereignty is in sight and it would be restored to them within
a reasonable time frame. It would have involved the people of the land
immediately in the election process, believing in the sincerity of the
“occupiers” and getting the destiny of the country settled by their own vote
and on their own accord. It would have gone a long way in mitigating the bloody
“skirmishes” around the country with huge reduction in the loss of human life
at both the sides. It would have stopped the “terrorist” activities to few and
far between.
President Bush would have been
wise enough to adopt this open strategy and “come out” of Iraq with
“clean” hands with no blood stain and show the “path” and the process of
“democratization” to the Muslim world. He would have then become the savior of
mankind but the vested interests “at hand” and “abroad” will not let him do
this job, resulting in shedding more blood of our innocent soldiers and Iraqi
people alike. Iraq
has now become a riddle for the superpower of time to resolve honestly and
justly in the best interest of the people of Iraq, the people of the USA and the
world community at large.
Shamim A Siddiqi
November 16, 2003